Logo




The state postsecondary performance measures and standards were developed over a two-year period with stakeholder input through the State Committee of Practitioners, The Alabama College System Measures and Standards Committee, the Student Competency Assessment and Documentation Committee, the Alabama Council on Career/Technical Education, and college presidents, deans, and instructors. (Imperatives 4, 5)

Following is the sequence of activities that resulted in the postsecondary core standards and performance measures.  These activities occurred between April 1997 and March 2000.

1. The Alabama College System Career/Technical Education Performance Measures and Standards Committee identified draft measures and standards for presentation to various stakeholder groups.

2. Draft measures and standards were presented to the Alabama Council on Career/Technical Education.  Revisions were made as recommended by the Council.

3. Through a census survey, instructional officers in the system made comments and recommendations relative to the proposed measures and standards.  Appropriate revisions were made.

4. Draft measures and standards were presented to the Committee of Practitioners.  Revisions were made as recommended by the Committee.

5. Survey instruments were sent to various stakeholders requesting them to rate the feasibility and importance of each proposed measure.  Survey instruments were sent to the following: college presidents, instructional officers, members of the Alabama Council on Career/Technical Education, and members of the Alabama State Board of Education.  Instruments were also sent to a random sample of career/technical education instructors in the System.  Mean scores indicating the feasibility of collecting requisite data and the importance of each measure were determined.  Those measures rating low in feasibility and importance were deleted.

6. Participants in the Workforce 21 strategic plan development process identified performance indicators.  Participants provided input through eleven regional meetings, four focus groups, and in position papers.  Their recommendations were used to refine the proposed performance measures.

7. College presidents and instructional officers identified standards for each performance measure through a modified Delphi technique.

8. After consultation with U.S. Department of Education officials, certain measures were deleted; others were identified as addressing one or more of the following: Perkins Act core indicators, potential indicators under the Workforce Investment Act, and internal indicators that will only be used at the state level.  (Note: All measures are internal indicators, but certain ones are only internal indicators.)

9. The Student Competency Assessment and Documentation Committee recommended the use of ACT Work Keys® to measure applied academic and technological competency attainment.

10. The Student Competency Assessment and Documentation Committee recommended language clarifying performance measures.

Following are performance measures and targeted levels of performance for career/technical education in The Alabama College System.  The targeted levels of performance are the state standards.  Actions and initiatives identified in the postsecondary section of the State Plan and in college plans are designed to move The Alabama College System from the current to the targeted levels of performance.

The performance measures respond to the Workforce 21 strategic plan and the accountability requirements of the 1998 Perkins Act and the Workforce Investment Act.  Both acts identify core performance indicators and allow for states to identify additional measures.  The postsecondary measures and targets serve as planning objectives and evaluation criteria at the program, college, and state levels.

Perkins Core Indicators

  • Student attainment of challenging state-established academic, vocational, and technical skill proficiencies.
  • Student attainment of a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent, a proficiency credential in conjunction with a secondary school diploma, or a postsecondary degree or credential.
  • Placement in, retention in, and completion of, postsecondary education or advanced training, placement in military service, or placement or retention in employment.
  • Student participation in and completion of vocational and technical education programs that lead to nontraditional training and employment.
  • Performance measures are grouped by corresponding Workforce 21 imperatives, thus illustrating the relationship between Workforce 21 and the postsecondary components of the State Plan.  The link between the postsecondary performance measures and the core indicators required in the Perkins legislation and the Workforce Investment Act is shown in italics following each measure.  For example, measure 1.a, "% completers scoring at or above the academic competency attainment levels identified for their particular program as measured by appropriate assessment instruments", is the response of The Alabama College System's to:
    • Perkins Act core indicator 1, "student attainment of challenging state-established academic, vocational, and technical skill proficiencies"; and
    • WIA Title II core indicator I, "demonstrated improvements in literacy skills levels in reading, writing, and speaking the English language, numeracy, problem solving, English language acquisition, and other literacy skills.


     
    Imperatives and Measures 
    Targeted Levels 
    of Performance
      2000-01 2003-04
    IMPERATIVE 1: ENSURE THAT STUDENTS ATTAIN THE SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE THEY WILL NEED IN THE FUTURE WORKPLACE AND FOR CONTINUED LEARNING.    
    1.a % students exiting program who are full completers

    Perkins core indicator: 3
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1,2

    70%
    75%
    1.b % full completers able to apply mathematical reasoning to work-related problems at or above the skill level identified for their program as measured by the ACT Work Keys® Applied Mathematics assessment

    Perkins core indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1

    75%
    80%
    1.c % full completers able to read and understand work-related instructions and policies at or above the skill level identified for their program as measured by the ACT Work Keys® Reading for Information assessment

    Perkins core indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1

    75% 80%
    1.d % full completers able to apply information presented in workplace graphics and gauges at or above the skill level identified for their program as measured by the ACT Work Keys® Locating Information assessment

    Perkins core indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1

    75% 80%
    1.e % full completers able to solve problems of a technological nature at or above the skill level identified for their program as measured by the ACT Work Keys® Applied Technology assessment

    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1


    75%

    80%
    1.f % career/technical education students with a grade point average of 2.0 or higher in academic course work

    Perkins core indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1

    75%
    80%
    1.g % career/technical education students with a grade point average of 2.0 or higher in career/technical course work

    Perkins core indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2

    75%
    80%
    1.h % full completers passing required licensure/certification examinations

    Perkins core indicators: 1, 2
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1

    75% 80%
    1.i % full completers scoring at or above the employability skills attainment level identified for their program as measured by the ACT Work Habits® assessment

    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1


    75%

    80%
    1.j % full completers employed in occupations related to their training 

    Perkins core indicator: 3
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2

    65%
    70%
    1.k % full completers employed in an occupation related to their training and/or continuing their education in a related field

    Perkins core indicator: 3
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2

    70%
    75%
    IMPERATIVE 2: EXPAND OPTIONS FOR STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE CAREER AND EDUCATION GOALS.
    2.a % students exiting program who are full completers or who are positive leavers

    Perkins core indicator: 3

    75%
    80%
    2.b % retainers

    Perkins core indicator: 3
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2

    25%
    30%
    2.c % full completers receiving The Alabama College System Career/Technical Education Competency Credential 

    Perkins core indicator: 2
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
    Potential WIA Title II indicators: 1, 2

    70%
    100%
    2.d % students enrolled in programs in preparation for non-traditional employment

    Perkins core indicator: 4
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2

    15%
    20%
    2.e % students enrolled in programs in preparation for non-traditional employment who are full completers or who are positive leavers

    Perkins indicator: 4
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2

    70%
    75%
    2.f % applicable programs having articulation agreements with secondary programs

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    70%
    100%
    IMPERATIVE 3: ANTICIPATE AND RESPOND QUICKLY TO CHANGES IN THE WORKPLACE AND IN SOCIETY.
    3.a % programs for which advisory committees meet at least annually

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    100%
    100%
    3.b % colleges in which stakeholders and other service providers actively participate in developing the Career/Technical Education Plan

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    100%
    100%
    3.c % colleges using occupational demand data in making decisions regarding program implementation, expansion, or disinvestment

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    100%
    100%
    3.d % businesses participating in Training for Business and Industry programs (or similar customized training programs) that indicate on evaluation instruments an overall satisfaction with the programs

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    85%
    90%
    IMPERATIVE 4: CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION.
    4.a % applicable programs certified by appropriate industry certification bodies

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    20%
    80%
    4.b % full-time instructors attending at least one technical update activity annually

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    75%
    85%
    4.c % programs in which curriculum is based on industry-identified competencies

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    100%
    100%
    IMPERATIVE 5: DEMONSTRATE ACCOUNTABILITY.
    5.a % students reported in categories other than "status unknown"

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    80%
    85%
    5.b % returned employer survey instruments indicating an overall positive perception of the training their employees received in career/technical education programs

    Perkins core indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1

    80%
    85%
    5.c % returned completer/leaver survey instruments indicating an overall positive perception of training received in career/technical education programs

    Perkins core indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
    Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1

    85%
    90%
    5.d % colleges that coordinate activities with other service providers to avoid duplication of programs and services

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    100%
    100%
    5.e % programs that, in the previous three years, have met or exceeded the minimum number of completers specified in Act 96-557 as being necessary for a program to be considered viable

    Internal indicator (state use only)

    80%
    85%