The state postsecondary performance measures and standards were developed over a
two-year period with stakeholder input through the State Committee of Practitioners,
The Alabama College System Measures and Standards Committee, the Student Competency
Assessment and Documentation Committee, the Alabama Council on Career/Technical
Education, and college presidents, deans, and instructors. (Imperatives 4, 5)
Following is the sequence of activities that resulted in the postsecondary core
standards and performance measures. These activities occurred between April
1997 and March 2000.
1. The Alabama College System Career/Technical Education Performance Measures and
Standards Committee identified draft measures and standards for presentation to
various stakeholder groups.
2. Draft measures and standards were presented to the Alabama Council on Career/Technical
Education. Revisions were made as recommended by the Council.
3. Through a census survey, instructional officers in the system made comments and
recommendations relative to the proposed measures and standards. Appropriate
revisions were made.
4. Draft measures and standards were presented to the Committee of Practitioners.
Revisions were made as recommended by the Committee.
5. Survey instruments were sent to various stakeholders requesting them to rate
the feasibility and importance of each proposed measure. Survey instruments
were sent to the following: college presidents, instructional officers, members
of the Alabama Council on Career/Technical Education, and members of the Alabama
State Board of Education. Instruments were also sent to a random sample of
career/technical education instructors in the System. Mean scores indicating
the feasibility of collecting requisite data and the importance of each measure
were determined. Those measures rating low in feasibility and importance were
deleted.
6. Participants in the Workforce 21 strategic plan development process identified
performance indicators. Participants provided input through eleven regional
meetings, four focus groups, and in position papers. Their recommendations
were used to refine the proposed performance measures.
7. College presidents and instructional officers identified standards for each performance
measure through a modified Delphi technique.
8. After consultation with U.S. Department of Education officials, certain measures
were deleted; others were identified as addressing one or more of the following:
Perkins Act core indicators, potential indicators under the Workforce Investment
Act, and internal indicators that will only be used at the state level. (Note:
All measures are internal indicators, but certain ones are only internal
indicators.)
9. The Student Competency Assessment and Documentation Committee recommended the
use of ACT Work Keys® to measure applied academic and technological competency
attainment.
10. The Student Competency Assessment and Documentation Committee recommended language
clarifying performance measures.
Following are performance measures and targeted levels of performance for career/technical
education in The Alabama College System. The targeted levels of performance
are the state standards. Actions and initiatives identified in the postsecondary
section of the State Plan and in college plans are designed to move The Alabama
College System from the current to the targeted levels of performance.
The performance measures respond to the Workforce 21 strategic plan and the
accountability requirements of the 1998 Perkins Act and the Workforce Investment
Act. Both acts identify core performance indicators and allow for states to
identify additional measures. The postsecondary measures and targets serve
as planning objectives and evaluation criteria at the program, college, and state
levels.
Perkins Core Indicators
Student attainment of challenging state-established academic, vocational, and technical
skill proficiencies.
Student attainment of a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent, a
proficiency credential in conjunction with a secondary school diploma, or a postsecondary
degree or credential.
Placement in, retention in, and completion of, postsecondary education or advanced
training, placement in military service, or placement or retention in employment.
Student participation in and completion of vocational and technical education programs
that lead to nontraditional training and employment.
Performance measures are grouped by corresponding Workforce 21 imperatives,
thus illustrating the relationship between Workforce 21 and the postsecondary
components of the State Plan. The link between the postsecondary performance
measures and the core indicators required in the Perkins legislation and the Workforce
Investment Act is shown in italics following each measure. For example, measure
1.a, "% completers scoring at or above the academic competency attainment levels
identified for their particular program as measured by appropriate assessment instruments",
is the response of The Alabama College System's to:
- Perkins Act core indicator 1, "student attainment of challenging state-established
academic, vocational, and technical skill proficiencies"; and
- WIA Title II core indicator I, "demonstrated improvements in literacy skills levels
in reading, writing, and speaking the English language, numeracy, problem solving,
English language acquisition, and other literacy skills.
|
Imperatives and Measures
|
Targeted Levels
of Performance
|
|
|
2000-01
|
2003-04
|
|
IMPERATIVE 1: ENSURE THAT STUDENTS ATTAIN THE SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE THEY WILL NEED
IN THE FUTURE WORKPLACE AND FOR CONTINUED LEARNING.
|
|
|
|
1.a % students exiting program who are full completers
Perkins core indicator: 3
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1,2
|
70%
|
75%
|
|
1.b % full completers able to apply mathematical reasoning to work-related problems
at or above the skill level identified for their program as measured by the ACT
Work Keys® Applied Mathematics assessment
Perkins core indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.c % full completers able to read and understand work-related instructions and
policies at or above the skill level identified for their program as measured by
the ACT Work Keys® Reading for Information assessment
Perkins core indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.d % full completers able to apply information presented in workplace graphics
and gauges at or above the skill level identified for their program as measured
by the ACT Work Keys® Locating Information assessment
Perkins core indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.e % full completers able to solve problems of a technological nature at or above
the skill level identified for their program as measured by the ACT Work Keys®
Applied Technology assessment
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.f % career/technical education students with a grade point average of 2.0 or higher
in academic course work
Perkins core indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.g % career/technical education students with a grade point average of 2.0 or higher
in career/technical course work
Perkins core indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.h % full completers passing required licensure/certification examinations
Perkins core indicators: 1, 2
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.i % full completers scoring at or above the employability skills attainment level
identified for their program as measured by the ACT Work Habits® assessment
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
1.j % full completers employed in occupations related to their training
Perkins core indicator: 3
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2
|
65%
|
70%
|
|
1.k % full completers employed in an occupation related to their training and/or
continuing their education in a related field
Perkins core indicator: 3
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2
|
70%
|
75%
|
|
IMPERATIVE 2: EXPAND OPTIONS FOR STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE CAREER AND EDUCATION GOALS.
|
|
|
|
2.a % students exiting program who are full completers or who are positive leavers
Perkins core indicator: 3
|
75%
|
80%
|
|
2.b % retainers
Perkins core indicator: 3
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2
|
25%
|
30%
|
|
2.c % full completers receiving The Alabama College System Career/Technical Education
Competency Credential
Perkins core indicator: 2
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 4
Potential WIA Title II indicators: 1, 2
|
70%
|
100%
|
|
2.d % students enrolled in programs in preparation for non-traditional employment
Perkins core indicator: 4
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2
|
15%
|
20%
|
|
2.e % students enrolled in programs in preparation for non-traditional employment
who are full completers or who are positive leavers
Perkins indicator: 4
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 2
|
70%
|
75%
|
|
2.f % applicable programs having articulation agreements with secondary programs
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
70%
|
100%
|
|
IMPERATIVE 3: ANTICIPATE AND RESPOND QUICKLY TO CHANGES IN THE WORKPLACE AND IN
SOCIETY.
|
|
|
|
3.a % programs for which advisory committees meet at least annually
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
3.b % colleges in which stakeholders and other service providers actively participate
in developing the Career/Technical Education Plan
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
3.c % colleges using occupational demand data in making decisions regarding program
implementation, expansion, or disinvestment
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
3.d % businesses participating in Training for Business and Industry programs (or
similar customized training programs) that indicate on evaluation instruments an
overall satisfaction with the programs
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
85%
|
90%
|
|
IMPERATIVE 4: CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION.
|
|
|
|
4.a % applicable programs certified by appropriate industry certification bodies
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
20%
|
80%
|
|
4.b % full-time instructors attending at least one technical update activity annually
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
75%
|
85%
|
|
4.c % programs in which curriculum is based on industry-identified competencies
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
IMPERATIVE 5: DEMONSTRATE ACCOUNTABILITY.
|
|
|
|
5.a % students reported in categories other than "status unknown"
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
80%
|
85%
|
|
5.b % returned employer survey instruments indicating an overall positive perception
of the training their employees received in career/technical education programs
Perkins core indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
80%
|
85%
|
|
5.c % returned completer/leaver survey instruments indicating an overall positive
perception of training received in career/technical education programs
Perkins core indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title I indicator: 1
Potential WIA Title II indicator: 1
|
85%
|
90%
|
|
5.d % colleges that coordinate activities with other service providers to avoid
duplication of programs and services
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
5.e % programs that, in the previous three years, have met or exceeded the minimum
number of completers specified in Act 96-557 as being necessary for a program to
be considered viable
Internal indicator (state use only)
|
80%
|
85%
|
|